Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
105 bytes added ,  16:57, October 1, 2009
scientific process of objectively studying both sides of the question
Line 23: Line 23:     
Bill Gray wrote:
 
Bill Gray wrote:
−
* The contrary views of the many warming skeptics have been largely ignored and their motives denigrated.<ref> [http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/Trenberth/XchangeGray_FtCollinsFeb08.pdf Area Experts Debate Global Warming]</ref>
+
* The contrary views of the many warming skeptics have been largely ignored and their motives denigrated.
 +
* The normal scientific process of objectively studying both sides of the question has not yet occurred.<ref> [http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/Trenberth/XchangeGray_FtCollinsFeb08.pdf Area Experts Debate Global Warming]</ref>
    
==Controversy==
 
==Controversy==
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu