Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
113 bytes added ,  22:39, October 2, 2009
solution
Line 7: Line 7:  
==Post V2 R.C. opposition==
 
==Post V2 R.C. opposition==
 
I find the edit of my small edit of Ultramontane vs Gallican to be unwarranted. It is not simply birth control (which is controversial as to being an ex cathedra dogma) but papal infallibility that finds dissent, and not simply by laity, as even the WP article on this states, Küng, Garry Wills) though (in addition to the one i referenced)  a 1989–1992 survey of young Catholics of multiple nationalities showed that only 36.9% affirmed the teaching on papal infallibility, with 36.9% denying it.<ref>Report on surveys of the International Marian Research Institute, by Johann G. Roten, S.M.</ref> [[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 18:31, 2 October 2009 (EDT)
 
I find the edit of my small edit of Ultramontane vs Gallican to be unwarranted. It is not simply birth control (which is controversial as to being an ex cathedra dogma) but papal infallibility that finds dissent, and not simply by laity, as even the WP article on this states, Küng, Garry Wills) though (in addition to the one i referenced)  a 1989–1992 survey of young Catholics of multiple nationalities showed that only 36.9% affirmed the teaching on papal infallibility, with 36.9% denying it.<ref>Report on surveys of the International Marian Research Institute, by Johann G. Roten, S.M.</ref> [[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 18:31, 2 October 2009 (EDT)
−
 
+
::the solution is for you to make two separate paragraphs. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 18:39, 2 October 2009 (EDT)
 
== two articles? merge ==
 
== two articles? merge ==
    
we should merge this with [[Roman Catholicism]] [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 17:47, 2 October 2009 (EDT)
 
we should merge this with [[Roman Catholicism]] [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 17:47, 2 October 2009 (EDT)
17,394

edits

Navigation menu