74
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: +
Talk:Ardipithecus ramidus (view source)
Revision as of 05:25, October 3, 2009
, 05:25, October 3, 2009no edit summary
There's got to be a better way of acknowledging the conflict between [[young earth creationism]] and modern science than a crack like "atheistic science". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 00:28, 3 October 2009 (EDT)
There's got to be a better way of acknowledging the conflict between [[young earth creationism]] and modern science than a crack like "atheistic science". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 00:28, 3 October 2009 (EDT)
:well, we have [[Atheistic Style]], [[Atheistic denial]] (which uses the term ""atheistic science"), [[Atheistic Logic]], [[Atheistic tools]] (which is associated with "Darwinian science," according to the article), and [[Atheistic Values]]. Why not "atheistic science" ? [[User:PeterF|PeterF]] 00:38, 3 October 2009 (EDT)
:well, we have [[Atheistic Style]], [[Atheistic denial]] (which uses the term ""atheistic science"), [[Atheistic Logic]], [[Atheistic tools]] (which is associated with "Darwinian science," according to the article), and [[Atheistic Values]]. Why not "atheistic science" ? [[User:PeterF|PeterF]] 00:38, 3 October 2009 (EDT)
::How about 'secular science'? I will change it to that and add some cites as to why this dating is invalid.[[User:TESvestad|TESvestad]] 01:25, 3 October 2009 (EDT)