Changes

:well, we have [[Atheistic Style]], [[Atheistic denial]] (which uses the term ""atheistic science"), [[Atheistic Logic]], [[Atheistic tools]] (which is associated with "Darwinian science," according to the article), and [[Atheistic Values]]. Why not "atheistic science" ? [[User:PeterF|PeterF]] 00:38, 3 October 2009 (EDT)

:well, we have [[Atheistic Style]], [[Atheistic denial]] (which uses the term ""atheistic science"), [[Atheistic Logic]], [[Atheistic tools]] (which is associated with "Darwinian science," according to the article), and [[Atheistic Values]]. Why not "atheistic science" ? [[User:PeterF|PeterF]] 00:38, 3 October 2009 (EDT)

::How about 'secular science'?  I will change it to that and add some cites as to why this dating is invalid.[[User:TESvestad|TESvestad]] 01:25, 3 October 2009 (EDT)

::How about 'secular science'?  I will change it to that and add some cites as to why this dating is invalid.[[User:TESvestad|TESvestad]] 01:25, 3 October 2009 (EDT)

::: I created this article with the appropriate references so it would be a reliable source of information.  I welcome any additional scientific information, not pseudo-science.  I also request that all edits be fully referenced.  For this reason the addition concerning the claims of creationists needs to be removed unless a reputable scientific source that specifically details why this fossil find is not over 4 million years old can be posted.  General statements like, "creations disagree" will not suffice and the reference provided gives no evidence about the inadequacy of radiometric dating methods that show a fossil is millions of years old.

::: I created this article with the appropriate references so it would be a reliable source of information.  I welcome any additional scientific information, not pseudo-science.  I also request that all edits be fully referenced.  For this reason the addition concerning the claims of creationists needs to be removed unless a reputable scientific source that specifically details why this fossil find is not over 4 million years old can be posted.  General statements like, "creations disagree" will not suffice and the reference provided gives no evidence about the inadequacy of radiometric dating methods that show a fossil is millions of years old.

:::Please provide references and justification for any claims of atheism amongst the scientists that are studying this find and why such a claim is relevant.  Anything else just detracts from the article. --[[User:MichaelJB|MichaelJB]] 14:28, 3 October 2009 (EDT)

:::Please provide references and justification for any claims of atheism amongst the scientists that are studying this find and why such a claim is relevant.  Anything else just detracts from the article. --[[User:MichaelJB|MichaelJB]] 14:28, 3 October 2009 (EDT)