25
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 64:
Line 64: + +
→Example of Liberalism
::::That's what they call an advertising gimmick. Since they are really using body paint, what can anyone "see"? Yes, they are being suggestive, in alluding they are nude, but in reality, they appear to the watcher the same as if fully clothed, due to the body paint. I don't think that rises to the level of perversion, just fairly mundane marketing. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 17:53, 28 July 2009 (EDT)
::::That's what they call an advertising gimmick. Since they are really using body paint, what can anyone "see"? Yes, they are being suggestive, in alluding they are nude, but in reality, they appear to the watcher the same as if fully clothed, due to the body paint. I don't think that rises to the level of perversion, just fairly mundane marketing. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 17:53, 28 July 2009 (EDT)
::::: Haha calm down guys, there's no way you can hope to understand the NZ sense of humour. This ad is brilliant. No-one here would seriously consider this advertisement to be offensive, "corrupt", or "sexually driven". Ya'll really need to settle down. I should also mention that the NZ Labour party is centre left, and the National party is centre right. There are no extremes in NZ politics and to use the American terms "liberal" and "conservative" is not correct. One more thing... NZ politics are not in the slightest bit influenced by religion. You really should read your own constitution about seperation of church and state. --[[User:Gilltm|Gilltm]]