2
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 246:
Line 246: + +
Conservapedia talk:About (view source)
Revision as of 15:26, October 6, 2009
, 15:26, October 6, 2009→You Serious?
: I can tell you're liberal just by your high word-to-substance ratio. If you really believed what you say, then you'd be protesting Obama's position about Afghanistan. Nope, I bet you support Obama 100%. You're not anti-war, you're a liberal who uses anti-war arguments only when they suit you. That's why people are liberal, so they can cling to [[double standard]]s as they like.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:31, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
: I can tell you're liberal just by your high word-to-substance ratio. If you really believed what you say, then you'd be protesting Obama's position about Afghanistan. Nope, I bet you support Obama 100%. You're not anti-war, you're a liberal who uses anti-war arguments only when they suit you. That's why people are liberal, so they can cling to [[double standard]]s as they like.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:31, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
: I can tell your a conservative by your 'I know you are but what am I argument'. If you really believed anything you say you would be protesting Bush's war for profit in Iraq. Double standards like Mark Foley you mean? Or maybe Tom Delay... He was found innocent because his bribe was in the form of a check. The ultimate in double standards. Conservatives cling to the illusion that they some how represent morality. What is moral about adultery, war, and exploitation? But, I see you are rewriting the bible to give yourself that morality you so desperately crave.