1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + +
Talk:Conservative Bible Project (view source)
Revision as of 15:36, October 6, 2009
, 15:36, October 6, 2009→The Example
==Spoiler==
Ultimately this entire project is futile, anyone who already believes will continue to believe with or without this project, and non-believers aren't going to be converted because you reworded the Bible. Just sayin.
==The Example==
==The Example==
I learned on this site that the Adulteress Story might not be an original addition to the Bible, and after looking into it myself, there does seem to be a good deal of evidence supporting this. I've similarly been trying to find authorities who question the authenticity of the Luke passage given here, but I haven't been able to find any. What is the source for this, and perhaps should the second to last paragraph of [[Essay:Adulteress Story]] be modified to reflect that this passage is also in dispute? [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 10:54, 13 August 2009 (EDT)
I learned on this site that the Adulteress Story might not be an original addition to the Bible, and after looking into it myself, there does seem to be a good deal of evidence supporting this. I've similarly been trying to find authorities who question the authenticity of the Luke passage given here, but I haven't been able to find any. What is the source for this, and perhaps should the second to last paragraph of [[Essay:Adulteress Story]] be modified to reflect that this passage is also in dispute? [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 10:54, 13 August 2009 (EDT)