Block
1,976
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 181:
Line 181: − :: Why not? You obviously know better than Biblical scholars and the Council of Trent. [[User:4m4z1ng|4m4z1ng]] 10:22, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
Talk:Conservative Bible Project (view source)
Revision as of 16:43, October 6, 2009
, 16:43, October 6, 2009→Remove references to wine or other alcohol: - rm more trolling
: Interesting point about wine being used as an alternative to dirty water, but your recommendation obviously goes way overboard. We're not rewriting the substance of the Bible here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:53, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
: Interesting point about wine being used as an alternative to dirty water, but your recommendation obviously goes way overboard. We're not rewriting the substance of the Bible here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:53, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
If drinking is a sin, then why is it that when Noah gets drunk after the flood, Canaan (who didn't even have anything to do with the ordeal) was cursed into slavery cause Ham looked upon the nakedness?
If drinking is a sin, then why is it that when Noah gets drunk after the flood, Canaan (who didn't even have anything to do with the ordeal) was cursed into slavery cause Ham looked upon the nakedness?