Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Articles for deletion (view source)
Revision as of 20:00, March 28, 2007
, 20:00, March 28, 2007Work with me?
:I'm also thinking of grouping all open AFD requests on a single page, using [[transclusion]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 15:51, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
:I'm also thinking of grouping all open AFD requests on a single page, using [[transclusion]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 15:51, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
::I think that's a great idea! The current AFDs (with the exception of [[AFD Evolutionism]] maybe - Is that one still open? There was a draft version, and somebody removed the template, but the article's Talk page basically went on about it... I lost track, I think) are quite short, so the resulting all-in-one page should be a nice move. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 15:56, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
::I think that's a great idea! The current AFDs (with the exception of [[AFD Evolutionism]] maybe - Is that one still open? There was a draft version, and somebody removed the template, but the article's Talk page basically went on about it... I lost track, I think) are quite short, so the resulting all-in-one page should be a nice move. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 15:56, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
:I'll start doing it, if you'll help. I'd like to have two pages - or one page with two sections.
:Anyway, the parts would list:
:#pages marked for deletion - and they still exist
:#pages marked for deletion - but they were deleted
:We might even be able to "close" discussions with a "no consensus" or "senior staff decided" or whatever. (Note that I am not senior staff; I just got here! ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:00, 28 March 2007 (EDT)