Automoderated users, edit
3,552
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 167:
Line 167: + + + +
→Your block of MarcusG: new section
:I also like your point about trusting experts in science. To some extent, this is necessary -- I'm not sure I have any personal reason to believe in the germ theory of disease, much less general relativity: I'm just taking someone's word for it. Obviously how much we should trust the experts on a particular subject depends on a lot of things. I bet some philosopher of science has thought hard about this -- I'd be interested to read the results! --[[User:MarkGall|MarkGall]] 00:33, 7 October 2009 (EDT) (hope I didn't forget to respond to anything!)
:I also like your point about trusting experts in science. To some extent, this is necessary -- I'm not sure I have any personal reason to believe in the germ theory of disease, much less general relativity: I'm just taking someone's word for it. Obviously how much we should trust the experts on a particular subject depends on a lot of things. I bet some philosopher of science has thought hard about this -- I'd be interested to read the results! --[[User:MarkGall|MarkGall]] 00:33, 7 October 2009 (EDT) (hope I didn't forget to respond to anything!)
:Fantastic job on [[complex number]], by the way.
:Fantastic job on [[complex number]], by the way.
== Your block of MarcusG ==
Mark, I'm concerned about this. Just because a user appears to be a parodist, doesn't mean they deserve an automatic block. We need proof, and this user just seems to be a normal user. What made you think they were a parodist? And what made you SURE enough of it to block them? [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 20:01, 8 October 2009 (EDT)