SkipCaptcha
710
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 172:
Line 172: + +
thank you
Mark, I'm concerned about this. Just because a user appears to be a parodist, doesn't mean they deserve an automatic block. We need proof, and this user just seems to be a normal user. What made you think they were a parodist? And what made you SURE enough of it to block them? His substantive edits include a question about the Conservative Bible Project, a legitimate edit re: a video game company, a legitimate edit to an article on a lawyer, and some McCarthy advocacy, which he can hardly be blamed for. What did he do wrong?
Mark, I'm concerned about this. Just because a user appears to be a parodist, doesn't mean they deserve an automatic block. We need proof, and this user just seems to be a normal user. What made you think they were a parodist? And what made you SURE enough of it to block them? His substantive edits include a question about the Conservative Bible Project, a legitimate edit re: a video game company, a legitimate edit to an article on a lawyer, and some McCarthy advocacy, which he can hardly be blamed for. What did he do wrong?
I don't want to step on your toes, but I believe this block should be undone. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 20:01, 8 October 2009 (EDT)
I don't want to step on your toes, but I believe this block should be undone. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 20:01, 8 October 2009 (EDT)
:Thanks for bringing the to my attention. I think I've become overly paranoid with all the recent vandalism. I did just give him a short block, but I will unblock him for now. The user has been making edits full of the sorts of weasel words that are typical of vandals ("This is a result from constant media ridicule brought on about by the Liberal video game companies as a way to discredit Jack and to get him to stop promoting the truth regarding video games" is not in my opinion encyclopedic content), and I think we should keep a close eye on him. --[[User:MarkGall|MarkGall]] 20:08, 8 October 2009 (EDT)