nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 293:
Line 293: − − == Two-time Grammy Award Winner & Birth Certificate == − − Could someone with the ability to edit this article include this? If you need a cite, go here [http://www.grammy.com/GRAMMY_Awards/Winners/] and search "Obama". Pretty cool, huh? − − Also I think the suggestions in this article that Obama was born on the moon or whatever should be removed; there seems to be no evidence to support them. − − [http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp] − − Here is his birth certificate: [http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html?source=SEM-RR-google-search-birth&gclid=CIfH7fqqsJ0CFUdM5QodCDmYiQ]. − − This will probably come as a relief to everyone who was worried that Obama was not a legitimate president.--[[User:Devonshire|Devonshire]] 12:05, 9 October 2009 (EDT)
Talk:Barack Hussein Obama (view source)
Revision as of 16:14, October 9, 2009
, 16:14, October 9, 2009Reverted edits by Devonshire (Talk) to last version by JMaker
There are two sections in the Obama's article about Liberals and Uncharitableness and Liberal Politicians and Uncharitableness. While this information is worth reading, these two sections are not really about Obama at all, and don't seem appropriate to include in the article in this manner. Both of these sections are summaries of articles on the given topics here on Conservapedia, and link to those articles. The sections themselves do not refer to Obama at all (only liberals -- or liberal politicians -- in general), and shouldn't be included in Obama's article unless we plan on adding the same sections to every page about liberals. It seems the best way to include this would be as links to those articles at the end of the section about Obama's uncharitableness -- as in "See also: Liberals and Uncharitableness, Liberal Politicians and Uncharitableness" sentence at the end of the descriptions of Obama's uncharitableness. [[User:Chris3145|Chris3145]] 14:13, 2 October 2009 (EDT)
There are two sections in the Obama's article about Liberals and Uncharitableness and Liberal Politicians and Uncharitableness. While this information is worth reading, these two sections are not really about Obama at all, and don't seem appropriate to include in the article in this manner. Both of these sections are summaries of articles on the given topics here on Conservapedia, and link to those articles. The sections themselves do not refer to Obama at all (only liberals -- or liberal politicians -- in general), and shouldn't be included in Obama's article unless we plan on adding the same sections to every page about liberals. It seems the best way to include this would be as links to those articles at the end of the section about Obama's uncharitableness -- as in "See also: Liberals and Uncharitableness, Liberal Politicians and Uncharitableness" sentence at the end of the descriptions of Obama's uncharitableness. [[User:Chris3145|Chris3145]] 14:13, 2 October 2009 (EDT)