55
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 169:
Line 169: + + + +
Talk:Conservative Bible Project (view source)
Revision as of 16:41, October 9, 2009
, 16:41, October 9, 2009→Forseen Problems,Notes and Commentary: new section
I think I know what the problem here is. Go [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/concise here] and come back when you understand this.
I think I know what the problem here is. Go [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/concise here] and come back when you understand this.
PS: I've spaced out edits so we can tell other comments apart form your massive walls of text that nobody's reading. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 00:46, 9 October 2009 (EDT)
PS: I've spaced out edits so we can tell other comments apart form your massive walls of text that nobody's reading. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 00:46, 9 October 2009 (EDT)
== Forseen Problems,Notes and Commentary ==
I think this is an excellent idea, a conservative Bible, which could greatly benifit many. But, the reason for putting this out should be for edifying Christians and for witnessing to non-christians, not as a rebuff to any new liberal translation. I see you believe there are some later added 'liberal' verses, which is fine. personally I believe that the entire bible is the inspired Word Of God, and to question one verses authenticity means questioning the entire Bibles authenticity. I would recommend a conservative commentary with conservative notes, then you can voice your opinions about these verses and other subjects and leave the Biblical text intact.I think this is a phenominal idea, just I question the right to add or remove verses from the Bible. Perhaps you were planning to do something like what I mentioned above anyway. I look forward to getting involved in this in any way I can. Veritas Vos Liberabit. ([[User:Baronvonbob|Baronvonbob]] 12:41, 9 October 2009 (EDT))