Changes

After reading more about this project I understand it less. If existing translations of the Bible are bad because of a liberal bias, shouldn't the goal be to create a neutral translation instead of a translation with conservative bias? Changing the political direction does not add any credibility to the resulting translation. Removing the perceived bias without adding your own bias could be useful. [[User:Fsamuels|Fsamuels]] 13:32, 9 October 2009 (EDT)

After reading more about this project I understand it less. If existing translations of the Bible are bad because of a liberal bias, shouldn't the goal be to create a neutral translation instead of a translation with conservative bias? Changing the political direction does not add any credibility to the resulting translation. Removing the perceived bias without adding your own bias could be useful. [[User:Fsamuels|Fsamuels]] 13:32, 9 October 2009 (EDT)

:Wouldn't "neutral" be the same as "compromise", politically-speaking?  Right now there is a "gender-neutral" version of the Bible on store shelves, because someone insisted and demanded that God be represented that way.  As far as a conservative version goes, it means "getting back to basics".  ''"What is conservatism? Is it not adherence to the old and tried, against the new and untried?"''  That's what Abraham Lincoln himself said about conservatism, and it applies here.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:09, 9 October 2009 (EDT)

:Wouldn't "neutral" be the same as "compromise", politically-speaking?  Right now there is a "gender-neutral" version of the Bible on store shelves, because someone insisted and demanded that God be represented that way.  As far as a conservative version goes, it means "getting back to basics".  ''"What is conservatism? Is it not adherence to the old and tried, against the new and untried?"''  That's what Abraham Lincoln himself said about conservatism, and it applies here.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:09, 9 October 2009 (EDT)