Automoderated users, edit
3,552
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: + + + + +
Talk:Bible Translation Issues (view source)
Revision as of 01:17, October 10, 2009
, 01:17, October 10, 2009no edit summary
Is the suggestion that this 17th c. version is the result of liberals? Why would anyone suggest that this is a modern day liberal corruption? I would love to see the textual evidence.
Is the suggestion that this 17th c. version is the result of liberals? Why would anyone suggest that this is a modern day liberal corruption? I would love to see the textual evidence.
:I don't think anybody is saying that modern day liberals are time travelling to put lies into the KJV and you know very well nobody is saying that. But when it comes to identifying what modern day liberals ARE saying, your rude tone ''(apology is accepted?)'', straw-man arguments, and refusal to actually examine the evidence gives you away.
:Just because the passage in question is in the KJV, doesn't mean it was in the original text - just see the adulteress story if you need any proof of that.
:You are welcome to stay here and contribute in a positive way, but if you continue to start arguments just to push your agenda, we know how to deal with that to. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 21:17, 9 October 2009 (EDT)