Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Conservative Bible Project (view source)

Revision as of 03:53, October 10, 2009

453 bytes added ,  03:53, October 10, 2009
→‎Forseen Problems,Notes and Commentary: final reply to Daniel re: Adulteress story
Line 155: Line 155:     
For what it is worth, I think since 1897, Roman Catholic exegetes are required to hold the Pericope Adulterae as genuine.[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 21:55, 9 October 2009 (EDT)
 
For what it is worth, I think since 1897, Roman Catholic exegetes are required to hold the Pericope Adulterae as genuine.[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 21:55, 9 October 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Daniel, you're most welcome to contribute to the project.  The bottom line is that this passage is not in the earliest manuscripts and there are many doctrinal and historical flaws to it, as explained in [[Essay:Adulteress Story]].  "Go and sin no more" is obviously not repentance.  But let's not get hung up on a handful of verses.  There are many more verses that await our attention.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:53, 9 October 2009 (EDT)
    
== Wouldn't a Neutral Bible project be more useful? ==
 
== Wouldn't a Neutral Bible project be more useful? ==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,936

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/708375"

Navigation menu