83
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
no edit summary
This should probably be merged with the article [[Celts]]. --[[User:OscarJ|OscarJ]] 11:50, 10 October 2009 (EDT)
This should probably be merged with the article [[Celts]]. --[[User:OscarJ|OscarJ]] 11:50, 10 October 2009 (EDT)
::::Agreed, having two articles for the same thing seems a bit redundant, what is the procedure for this? Obviously I'd rather this article wasn't consigned to oblivion since I just typed it and intend to expand it further, but I also think its the better article of the two (though the title Celts is probably better than Celt).