6
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Bible translations (view source)
Revision as of 02:43, October 12, 2009
, 02:43, October 12, 2009Created page with '= NASB = If anyone wants, I have a NASB from which I can pull their translation notes where they come out and tell you that there are certain passages that may not have been in t...'
= NASB =
If anyone wants, I have a NASB from which I can pull their translation notes where they come out and tell you that there are certain passages that may not have been in the original text. They use italics anywhere that a word is not literally word for word from the original Hebrew/Greek/Aramaic. There's also always notes letting you know what the literal meaning of the passage is. For passages that don't appear in certain earlier passages, they also make mention of that. --[[User:D3matt|D3matt]] 22:43, 11 October 2009 (EDT)
= KJV =
If we're going to be intellectually honest, there needs to be a much harsher criticism of the KJV. The original intentions of the translation were not entirely honorable. The original manuscript had terrible errors (thou shalt commit adultery?). There are countless passages that are rendered from very poorly to being downright heretical. We Conservatives should not be afraid of truth, especially as far as The Good News is concerned. --[[User:D3matt|D3matt]] 22:43, 11 October 2009 (EDT)
= NIV =
Wow... Just wow...
* Lucifer means "morning star" [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lucifer]
* capstones are even more important than cornerstones
* I'll leave Luke 1:15 alone... there's a note in my NIV stating that it literally is "Or from his mother's womb"
--[[User:D3matt|D3matt]] 22:43, 11 October 2009 (EDT)
If anyone wants, I have a NASB from which I can pull their translation notes where they come out and tell you that there are certain passages that may not have been in the original text. They use italics anywhere that a word is not literally word for word from the original Hebrew/Greek/Aramaic. There's also always notes letting you know what the literal meaning of the passage is. For passages that don't appear in certain earlier passages, they also make mention of that. --[[User:D3matt|D3matt]] 22:43, 11 October 2009 (EDT)
= KJV =
If we're going to be intellectually honest, there needs to be a much harsher criticism of the KJV. The original intentions of the translation were not entirely honorable. The original manuscript had terrible errors (thou shalt commit adultery?). There are countless passages that are rendered from very poorly to being downright heretical. We Conservatives should not be afraid of truth, especially as far as The Good News is concerned. --[[User:D3matt|D3matt]] 22:43, 11 October 2009 (EDT)
= NIV =
Wow... Just wow...
* Lucifer means "morning star" [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lucifer]
* capstones are even more important than cornerstones
* I'll leave Luke 1:15 alone... there's a note in my NIV stating that it literally is "Or from his mother's womb"
--[[User:D3matt|D3matt]] 22:43, 11 October 2009 (EDT)