SkipCaptcha
175
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 220:
Line 220: + + + + + +
Talk:Conservative Bible Project (view source)
Revision as of 22:19, October 12, 2009
, 22:19, October 12, 2009→Peter or Jesus's sentence as the basis for Christianity?: new section
This is a tangent (ha-ha), but I think that this is a brilliant and needed project. There's also a real need and opportunity to affect the [[secular]] world with a [[Conservative Mathematics Project]]. I've made a start and given the rationale there. I think of the [[Conservative Bible Project]] as providing a 100% conservative reference for the spiritual world, and the [[Conservative Mathematics Project]] as providing a 100% conservative reference for the physical and political worlds. These are two projects I hope that [[Isaac Newton]] would bless. [[User:SRFoster|SRFoster]] 10:53, 12 October 2009 (EDT)
This is a tangent (ha-ha), but I think that this is a brilliant and needed project. There's also a real need and opportunity to affect the [[secular]] world with a [[Conservative Mathematics Project]]. I've made a start and given the rationale there. I think of the [[Conservative Bible Project]] as providing a 100% conservative reference for the spiritual world, and the [[Conservative Mathematics Project]] as providing a 100% conservative reference for the physical and political worlds. These are two projects I hope that [[Isaac Newton]] would bless. [[User:SRFoster|SRFoster]] 10:53, 12 October 2009 (EDT)
== Peter or Jesus's sentence as the basis for Christianity? ==
One think I've always puzzled about the Bible is that part (Matt. 16:15-20) when Jesus asks the disciples what they think about him. Only Peter answers correctly, and says that Jesus is the Messiah and the Son of God. Then Jesus replies that weird (meaning: I can't get a good translation of what he said!!!) answer that Peter is a stone and over that stone Jesus's church will be build.
I can't believe that Jesus was saying that the stone was '''Peter'''. I think it should be clear that the stone is '''Jesus is the Messiah and the Son of God'''. But of course the translations are ambiguous, and the official Roman Catholic interpretation is that the stone is Peter. [[User:Sunda62|Sunda62]] 18:19, 12 October 2009 (EDT)