1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 35:
Line 35: + +
→Busing & beyond!: It is irrelevant
I agree, busing is kinda lame. I thought ''Greene'' was justified for a short time, but I agree with the cases ending busing (see e.g. ''Keyes''). That said, RSchlalfy, seriously? Lame.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 17:18, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
I agree, busing is kinda lame. I thought ''Greene'' was justified for a short time, but I agree with the cases ending busing (see e.g. ''Keyes''). That said, RSchlalfy, seriously? Lame.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 17:18, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
: It is irrelevant. Scalia has been on the Supreme Court for about 20 years. Write about what he has actually said and done, instead of trying to extrapolate his logic to other issues. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:28, 28 March 2007 (EDT)