Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Taking command: reply to the king of the hill
Line 57: Line 57:     
Comments, anyone? Reply here or on my Talk page for now.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 22:07, 13 October 2009 (EDT)
 
Comments, anyone? Reply here or on my Talk page for now.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 22:07, 13 October 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Terry, your comments and leadership are superb, but we are a meritocracy.  One is "king of the hill" only as long as he is the best.  Let's expect and welcome talented contributions by many others, and perhaps even a run at your position at the top of the hill!  This will get even more interesting.
 +
 +
:Qualifications?  I've studied ancient Greek, modern English, political bias and, perhaps most importantly, the effective communication of ideas to students.  All four are important components of this project.  But I concede and welcome your expertise in the ancient languages, which is invaluable.
 +
 +
:I agree completely with your view towards capitalization, and add an additional reason for it:  often there are multiple pronoun references (to Jesus and someone else) and use of capitalization is an efficient way to avoid repetition of the names for clarity.
 +
 +
:I think your other points are open to more discussion and debate.  Taking one, I feel the term "Pharisees" means nothing to people today, and their biblical views seem irrelevant.  I'm intrigued by calling them "incumbents" because that gets at the real issue and conflict, doesn't it?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:57, 13 October 2009 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,961

edits

Navigation menu