Block, Automoderated users, edit
398
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 74:
Line 74: + + + +
Talk:John 1-7 (Translated) (view source)
Revision as of 01:49, October 16, 2009
, 01:49, October 16, 2009no edit summary
Again, John's statement here is closer to "after me comes a man who existed prior to me, because he was before me," which is a very emphatic way of pointing to the pre-existence of Christ, particularly as the last phrase uses "protos," which strictly speaking tells us that John is saying Christ "came first, before me." A strong, emphatic statement. [[User:Mback|Mback]] 8:28, 15 October 2009 (EDT)
Again, John's statement here is closer to "after me comes a man who existed prior to me, because he was before me," which is a very emphatic way of pointing to the pre-existence of Christ, particularly as the last phrase uses "protos," which strictly speaking tells us that John is saying Christ "came first, before me." A strong, emphatic statement. [[User:Mback|Mback]] 8:28, 15 October 2009 (EDT)
== 1:32 ==
The tense is wrong here. It is NOT present tense ("I do not know..."), but pluperfect (past completed - "I had not known..."). The construction used here means "I had not (before this very moment) known who He was...". An acceptable translation would be, "I did not know who he was...," but placing this in the present tense completely misses what the Greek is saying. Eido is something of a surface kind of knowing and seeing, thus it is, in this context, about identity, not a deeper kind of "knowing him personally." The point here is that John was preparing the way for one who would take away our sins, but until this very moment, he did not know the exact identity of that man. [[User:Mback|Mback]] 9:47, 15 October 2009 (EDT)
== John 2:1 ==
== John 2:1 ==