1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 992:
Line 992: + + +
Talk:Theory of relativity (view source)
Revision as of 16:01, October 16, 2009
, 16:01, October 16, 2009→Quantum Field Theory/Changes to the Intro: QED was created to make quantum mechanics relativistic, and it is a fully relativistic theory
:::::::: Relativity has produced nothing of value, and this discussion isn't doing any better. The replies above are unresponsive to my points, and historically incorrect. Are you saying that taxpayers should be forced to pay for this unproductive work? Do you donate to it? if your answer is "yes, no" then that speaks volumes.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]]
:::::::: Relativity has produced nothing of value, and this discussion isn't doing any better. The replies above are unresponsive to my points, and historically incorrect. Are you saying that taxpayers should be forced to pay for this unproductive work? Do you donate to it? if your answer is "yes, no" then that speaks volumes.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]]
::::::::: RubyR/Linuxgal is incorrect. Quantum electrodynamics has everthing to do with relativity. QED was created to make quantum mechanics relativistic, and it is a fully relativistic theory. That is how we got the Dirac equation of the electron. Without relativity, there is no QED, and no understanding of modern electronics. However, QED has nothing to do with with Einstein's 1905 paper on the photon. Einstein proposed that light is transmitted as a particle, rather than a wave, but QED treats light transmission as a wave.
::::::::: Andy, this Talk page is for improving the article. I suggest fixing the errors, and let the reader decide for himself whether relativity is worth taxpayer support. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 12:01, 16 October 2009 (EDT)