153
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 132:
Line 132: + +
→You're a parody, right?
:: Flippin that was not very nice. Do not take the Lord's name in vain! [User:GentlemanSun|GentlemanSun]
:: Flippin that was not very nice. Do not take the Lord's name in vain! [User:GentlemanSun|GentlemanSun]
So how do you explain the defense of Nessie as a modern dinosaur, and "Jesus spoke English," unless you're a parody? Again, funny stuff.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 17:59, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
So how do you explain the defense of Nessie as a modern dinosaur, and "Jesus spoke English," unless you're a parody? Again, funny stuff.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 17:59, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
:Ames, if your desire is to be expunged from Conservapedia with the rest of your liberal agitators, that's fine, but don't trammel my work. To my knowledge, nobody has seen Nessie, and so it is formally possible she could be a dinosaur, that survived the Flood and the subsequent post-flood dislocations. Moreover, that's a good deal more possible given the Biblical Time Scale. I never said that Jesus spoke English, just that the translators of the KJV were divinely inspired and truly doing His work. I'm not sure what the rest of your critiques mean, but you're obviously a hostile secularist, and largely without merit. I've observed your materialist attempts to champion evolution, and that's actively hostile to the will of the Lord. [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 18:02, 28 March 2007 (EDT)