9
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + Line 351:
Line 351: + + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Conservative Bible Project (view source)
Revision as of 00:32, October 21, 2009
, 00:32, October 21, 2009no edit summary
For older discussion, see [[Talk:Conservative Bible Project/Archive 1|here]].
--[[User:BenBr|BenBr]] 20:32, 20 October 2009 (EDT)For older discussion, see [[Talk:Conservative Bible Project/Archive 1|here]].
(continuing from archive)
(continuing from archive)
::: Better, but overly legalistic. How about "decent" and "indecent"? Let's keep trying.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:33, 18 October 2009 (EDT)
::: Better, but overly legalistic. How about "decent" and "indecent"? Let's keep trying.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:33, 18 October 2009 (EDT)
==Problems with this project==
There are so many ethical and logical issues with this project it makes my head spin
1.) I see the argument "the bible is the infallable word of god" used on this sight with stunning frequency, but clearly its not if it has become "liberalized" and you need to create a conservative version of it
2.) Does anyone on this project even speak hebrew or any of the other languages the original drafts the bible was scripted in? Because if your not, its not translation, it't the deliberate corruption of a document to meet your political goals
3.) Using "concise" terms kinda seems like newspeak to me. Trying to exclude ambiguity and create black and white passages is a hall mark of ingsoc. Indeed, this entire project seems like it is coming directly from minitru
4.)I fail to see how "comrade" is a liberal term, its etamology goes back to the 1500's. Sure it was used by the USSR, but the nazi used "heil hitler" dosn't make "hail to the chief" a facist song
5.) I highly doubt an ultr right wing version of the bible is going to enter the "liberal" public schools as a textbook when the "liberal" versions arn't allowed
6.) If reading it is neccesary to critisize it, and that will "open" our minds, then the same could be said of "The Origin of Species"
This whole idea just seems like propaganda--[[User:BenBr|BenBr]] 20:32, 20 October 2009 (EDT)