2,732
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 73:
Line 73: + + + +
RSchlafly
I am also wondering about Letusratiocinate's comment, "Opinions and conjectures, not supported by definitions, shared understanding or usage". I tried to be consistent with dictionary definitions, such as [http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=theory], and with common usage. I can find citations as requested, but it would help if someone would explain here what is doubtful and need documentation. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 12:26, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
I am also wondering about Letusratiocinate's comment, "Opinions and conjectures, not supported by definitions, shared understanding or usage". I tried to be consistent with dictionary definitions, such as [http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=theory], and with common usage. I can find citations as requested, but it would help if someone would explain here what is doubtful and need documentation. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 12:26, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
== RSchlafly ==
Your edits were the height of inanity. Saying, "some people say this, but only because they're evolutionists," whatever that means, is asinine. It's an argument that contains its own refutation, and is thoroughly un-encyclopedic, uninformative, and worthless.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 18:53, 28 March 2007 (EDT)