Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:     
:::::Has nothing to do with being a "liberal", etc.  He was a subversive disinformation operative, one of dozens we see daily.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 19:15, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::Has nothing to do with being a "liberal", etc.  He was a subversive disinformation operative, one of dozens we see daily.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 19:15, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::::I agree, this as nothing to do with Richard being “liberal”—but [[User:TK|TerryK]] seems to disagree.  He wrote that this article “ …is mainly the work of the deceitful (now blocked) Liberal Sysop Richard.”  Had he not felt the need to ad the word “liberal” I would not have commented, but he did and so I felt the need to respond.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 19:19, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
    
::Everything he wrote is accurate. He just left other things out and phrased it in such a way that it comes off as a fawning lovenote to the guy instead of a genuine critique. Which, again, is the whole point. TPTB (and esp. Andy) were all content to let it stand b/c he had the "proper" political viewpoint. Andy even SysOped him b/c of this article. Isn't THAT the issue you should be more concerned about? It's like a doctor just revealed a tumor and you're more concerned about the doctor finding it than finding a cure.--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 09:28, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::Everything he wrote is accurate. He just left other things out and phrased it in such a way that it comes off as a fawning lovenote to the guy instead of a genuine critique. Which, again, is the whole point. TPTB (and esp. Andy) were all content to let it stand b/c he had the "proper" political viewpoint. Andy even SysOped him b/c of this article. Isn't THAT the issue you should be more concerned about? It's like a doctor just revealed a tumor and you're more concerned about the doctor finding it than finding a cure.--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 09:28, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
553

edits

Navigation menu