1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 456:
Line 456: + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 14:55, October 26, 2009
, 14:55, October 26, 2009→#15 – »blog monitoring«: new section
We should investigate this and try to overturn the Section 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Charitable Organization classification Wikipedia has falsely secured. [[User:MattL|MattL]] 14:44, 11 February 2009 (EST)
We should investigate this and try to overturn the Section 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Charitable Organization classification Wikipedia has falsely secured. [[User:MattL|MattL]] 14:44, 11 February 2009 (EST)
:What money making schemes? Accepting grants and donations? Numerous, if not most, respected non-profits do this. I honestly don't see how they are doing anything that could violate their non-profit classification. ----[[User:Mschel|Mark]] [[User_talk:Mschel|(Mschel)]] 19:05, 21 August 2009 (EDT)
:What money making schemes? Accepting grants and donations? Numerous, if not most, respected non-profits do this. I honestly don't see how they are doing anything that could violate their non-profit classification. ----[[User:Mschel|Mark]] [[User_talk:Mschel|(Mschel)]] 19:05, 21 August 2009 (EDT)
== #15 – »blog monitoring« ==
:''»We do not ban users based on their comments elsewhere, such as on their own blog. Wikipedia will monitor users' blogs and ban them for their exercise of free speech on their own blogs«''
Can someone point me to any evidence on this? I cannot quite believe that this is true, but it would be very shocking! --[[User:PhilN|PhilN]] 10:55, 26 October 2009 (EDT)