Changes

By using your own logic how can 55% of scientists who stand by unaided evolution be wrong? Also the 40% you quote is actual scientists who believe in evolution but also think god guided it. 5% of scientists disagree with evolution, if you read the source you quoted you must be aware of this, so either you purposely misquoted or you didn't even bother reading a source. Furthermore the category "scientist" includes people whose area of study is nothing to do with evolution. If you looked at a poll from biologists you would likely see results that support evolution even more.  

By using your own logic how can 55% of scientists who stand by unaided evolution be wrong? Also the 40% you quote is actually scientists who believe in evolution but also think god guided it. 5% of scientists disagree with evolution, if you read the source you quoted you must be aware of this, so either you purposely misquoted or you didn't even bother reading a source. Furthermore the category "scientist" includes people whose area of study is nothing to do with evolution. If you looked at a poll from biologists you would likely see results that support evolution even more.  

Making further use of the source you so generously provided you can see that college graduates are almost 4 times as likely to support naturalistic evolution than people who lack a high school diploma. People with an income over $50,000 are more than twice as likely to believe in naturalistic evolution than people with an income under $20,000.  [[User:Jamesmackenzie|Jamesmackenzie]] 16:09, 28 October 2009 (EDT)

Making further use of the source you so generously provided you can see that college graduates are almost 4 times as likely to support naturalistic evolution than people who lack a high school diploma. People with an income over $50,000 are more than twice as likely to believe in naturalistic evolution than people with an income under $20,000.  [[User:Jamesmackenzie|Jamesmackenzie]] 16:09, 28 October 2009 (EDT)