24
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + + + +
Talk:Sexual discrimination (view source)
Revision as of 20:42, November 1, 2009
, 20:42, November 1, 2009no edit summary
I am ''extremely'' skeptical about some of the allegations in the "33 indicators" section (especially the percent of wealth controlled -- how do they define "control?"). Please provide some substantiation -- thanks. [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 15:08, 15 September 2007 (EDT)
I am ''extremely'' skeptical about some of the allegations in the "33 indicators" section (especially the percent of wealth controlled -- how do they define "control?"). Please provide some substantiation -- thanks. [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 15:08, 15 September 2007 (EDT)
== Serious problems ==
I'm tempted to blank this article and start again- It's poorly sourced, seems to be very biased (section on sexism against men, and not sexism against women ?!) and doesn't really give a general explanation of sexism. I'm not going to be too aggressive on this one, but although sexism against men does exist, the examples given are very poor. We need to focus on sexism within divorce law e.t.c. I don't really see how women's only carriages constitute discrimination. That's about women's safety. Sexism against women section should include things about women's suffrage and rape. Anyone else agree ? If you do, I'm going to do a bit of rewriting [[User:ArnoldLarny|ArnoldLarny]] 15:42, 1 November 2009 (EST)
== Robert Sheaffer ==
== Robert Sheaffer ==