Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
slightly revised to address pedantic objection by an apparent evolutionist
Line 162: Line 162:     
Many arguments for a recent creation have been put forward by creationary scientists, both scientific and theological arguments.
 
Many arguments for a recent creation have been put forward by creationary scientists, both scientific and theological arguments.
 +
 +
Scientific arguments include [[radiometric dating]] results that disagree with secular ages, other dating methods that do not fit with secular ages, and phenomenon showing events that occurred quickly.
 +
 +
There should be virtually no <sup>14</sup>C present in carbon supposedly older than 100,000 years, yet it has proved impossible to find any such carbon without <sup>14</sup>C.
    
Dating methods don't have to be based on radioactivity.
 
Dating methods don't have to be based on radioactivity.
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,912

edits

Navigation menu