| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| | == Principles == | | == Principles == |
| | | | |
| − | | + | [[Image:C-14decay.JPG|framed|The first-order decay curve of carbon-14 based on the half-life of 5730 years.]] |
| | The technique is based on comparing the levels of <SUP>14</SUP>C and <SUP>12</SUP>C [[isotope]]s in the sample. | | The technique is based on comparing the levels of <SUP>14</SUP>C and <SUP>12</SUP>C [[isotope]]s in the sample. |
| | <sup>14</sup>C is produced in the atmosphere by cosmic ray [[neutron]]s replacing a [[proton]] in [[nitrogen]] (<sup>14</sup>N), producing <sup>14</sup>C.<ref name="TH">Higham, Thomas, [http://www.c14dating.com/int.html Introduction], Radiocarbon web-info.</ref> | | <sup>14</sup>C is produced in the atmosphere by cosmic ray [[neutron]]s replacing a [[proton]] in [[nitrogen]] (<sup>14</sup>N), producing <sup>14</sup>C.<ref name="TH">Higham, Thomas, [http://www.c14dating.com/int.html Introduction], Radiocarbon web-info.</ref> |
| Line 12: |
Line 12: |
| | In the meantime, however, the <sup>14</sup>C will combine with [[oxygen]] in the atmosphere to form [[carbon dioxide]], which enters the food chain via [[photosynthesis]] in plants.<ref name="TH" /> | | In the meantime, however, the <sup>14</sup>C will combine with [[oxygen]] in the atmosphere to form [[carbon dioxide]], which enters the food chain via [[photosynthesis]] in plants.<ref name="TH" /> |
| | By this means, most living things also have <sup>14</sup>C and <sup>12</sup>C in the same ratio as in the atmosphere. | | By this means, most living things also have <sup>14</sup>C and <sup>12</sup>C in the same ratio as in the atmosphere. |
| − | This ratio is about one <sup>14</sup>C atom for every 1,000,000,000,000 currently but this is a decelerating rate of change. <sup>12</sup>C atoms.<ref name="TH" /> | + | This ratio is about one <sup>14</sup>C atom for every 1,000,000,000,000 <sup>12</sup>C atoms.<ref name="TH" /> |
| | | | |
| | However, when the sample dies, it stops ingesting <sup>14</sup>C, so as the <sup>14</sup>C decays to <sup>14</sup>N, the ratio of <sup>14</sup>C and <sup>12</sup>C changes. | | However, when the sample dies, it stops ingesting <sup>14</sup>C, so as the <sup>14</sup>C decays to <sup>14</sup>N, the ratio of <sup>14</sup>C and <sup>12</sup>C changes. |
| | This ratio of <sup>14</sup>C to <sup>12</sup>C is measured and a calculation turns the measurement into a figure representing how long ago the sample died. | | This ratio of <sup>14</sup>C to <sup>12</sup>C is measured and a calculation turns the measurement into a figure representing how long ago the sample died. |
| | + | |
| | + | Depending on the method used to measure the <sup>14</sup>C, after about 50,000 years or so there is not enough left to measure, although advanced techniques can possibly stretch that to 100,000 years.<ref>Nave, R., [http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/cardat.html Carbon Dating], Georgia State University.</ref> |
| | + | This then becomes the maximum age that can theoretically be derived by this method. |
| | + | |
| | + | Therefore, any sample with too little <sup>14</sup>C to measure must, in theory, be older than 50,000 to 100,000 years, and it is not possible to determine how much older. |
| | + | Similarly, any sample with measurable <sup>14</sup>C must be younger than 50,000 to 100,000 years, assuming that adequate precautions have been taken to eliminate contamination. |
| | | | |
| | == Limits of Carbon Dating == | | == Limits of Carbon Dating == |
| Line 55: |
Line 61: |
| | It was later measured more accurately to be 5730±40 years, now known as the ''Cambridge half-life''.<ref name="TH" /> | | It was later measured more accurately to be 5730±40 years, now known as the ''Cambridge half-life''.<ref name="TH" /> |
| | | | |
| | + | == Widespread misunderstandings == |
| | + | |
| | + | Many people believe that carbon dating has proved that the Earth is millions or billions of years old, much older than the biblically-derived date of around 6,000 years. |
| | + | However, as explained above, carbon dating is incapable of providing dates in the range of millions or billions of years. |
| | | | |
| | + | Some also argue that carbon dating should only be used on samples that fall within the range over which it can measure. |
| | + | However, this begs the question of how one might determine this prior to using carbon dating to determine the age. |
| | + | They further argue that dating much older items will result in anomalous dates, which might fall within the range that carbon dating can measure. |
| | + | This is incorrect. Any sample that is older than the range that carbon dating will measure will record zero <sup>14</sup>C, and can therefore not be confused with younger samples. |
| | | | |
| | ==See also== | | ==See also== |