Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,709 bytes added ,  22:17, November 2, 2009
m
Reverted edits by Pgmm (Talk) to last version by Aschlafly
Line 4: Line 4:  
== Principles ==
 
== Principles ==
   −
 
+
[[Image:C-14decay.JPG|framed|The first-order decay curve of carbon-14 based on the half-life of 5730 years.]]
 
The technique is based on comparing the levels of <SUP>14</SUP>C and <SUP>12</SUP>C [[isotope]]s in the sample.
 
The technique is based on comparing the levels of <SUP>14</SUP>C and <SUP>12</SUP>C [[isotope]]s in the sample.
 
<sup>14</sup>C is produced in the atmosphere by cosmic ray [[neutron]]s replacing a [[proton]] in [[nitrogen]] (<sup>14</sup>N), producing <sup>14</sup>C.<ref name="TH">Higham, Thomas, [http://www.c14dating.com/int.html Introduction], Radiocarbon web-info.</ref>
 
<sup>14</sup>C is produced in the atmosphere by cosmic ray [[neutron]]s replacing a [[proton]] in [[nitrogen]] (<sup>14</sup>N), producing <sup>14</sup>C.<ref name="TH">Higham, Thomas, [http://www.c14dating.com/int.html Introduction], Radiocarbon web-info.</ref>
Line 12: Line 12:  
In the meantime, however, the <sup>14</sup>C will combine with [[oxygen]] in the atmosphere to form [[carbon dioxide]], which enters the food chain via [[photosynthesis]] in plants.<ref name="TH" />
 
In the meantime, however, the <sup>14</sup>C will combine with [[oxygen]] in the atmosphere to form [[carbon dioxide]], which enters the food chain via [[photosynthesis]] in plants.<ref name="TH" />
 
By this means, most living things also have <sup>14</sup>C and <sup>12</sup>C in the same ratio as in the atmosphere.
 
By this means, most living things also have <sup>14</sup>C and <sup>12</sup>C in the same ratio as in the atmosphere.
This ratio is about one <sup>14</sup>C atom for every 1,000,000,000,000 currently but this is a decelerating rate of change. <sup>12</sup>C atoms.<ref name="TH" />
+
This ratio is about one <sup>14</sup>C atom for every 1,000,000,000,000 <sup>12</sup>C atoms.<ref name="TH" />
    
However, when the sample dies, it stops ingesting <sup>14</sup>C, so as the <sup>14</sup>C decays to <sup>14</sup>N, the ratio of <sup>14</sup>C and <sup>12</sup>C changes.
 
However, when the sample dies, it stops ingesting <sup>14</sup>C, so as the <sup>14</sup>C decays to <sup>14</sup>N, the ratio of <sup>14</sup>C and <sup>12</sup>C changes.
 
This ratio of <sup>14</sup>C to <sup>12</sup>C is measured and a calculation turns the measurement into a figure representing how long ago the sample died.
 
This ratio of <sup>14</sup>C to <sup>12</sup>C is measured and a calculation turns the measurement into a figure representing how long ago the sample died.
 +
 +
Depending on the method used to measure the <sup>14</sup>C, after about 50,000 years or so there is not enough left to measure, although advanced techniques can possibly stretch that to 100,000 years.<ref>Nave, R., [http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/cardat.html Carbon Dating], Georgia State University.</ref>
 +
This then becomes the maximum age that can theoretically be derived by this method.
 +
 +
Therefore, any sample with too little <sup>14</sup>C to measure must, in theory, be older than 50,000 to 100,000 years, and it is not possible to determine how much older.
 +
Similarly, any sample with measurable <sup>14</sup>C must be younger than 50,000 to 100,000 years, assuming that adequate precautions have been taken to eliminate contamination.
    
== Limits of Carbon Dating ==
 
== Limits of Carbon Dating ==
Line 55: Line 61:  
It was later measured more accurately to be 5730±40 years, now known as the ''Cambridge half-life''.<ref name="TH" />
 
It was later measured more accurately to be 5730±40 years, now known as the ''Cambridge half-life''.<ref name="TH" />
    +
== Widespread misunderstandings ==
 +
 +
Many people believe that carbon dating has proved that the Earth is millions or billions of years old, much older than the biblically-derived date of around 6,000 years.
 +
However, as explained above, carbon dating is incapable of providing dates in the range of millions or billions of years.
    +
Some also argue that carbon dating should only be used on samples that fall within the range over which it can measure.
 +
However, this begs the question of how one might determine this prior to using carbon dating to determine the age.
 +
They further argue that dating much older items will result in anomalous dates, which might fall within the range that carbon dating can measure.
 +
This is incorrect.  Any sample that is older than the range that carbon dating will measure will record zero <sup>14</sup>C, and can therefore not be confused with younger samples.
    
==See also==
 
==See also==
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794

edits

Navigation menu