Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 328: Line 328:     
:::As to your other point, please take no offense (I'm being as gingerly as possible), how does one know if the Bible is well written if he doesn't read it regularly???  Food for thought for an open-minded.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:10, 2 November 2009 (EST)
 
:::As to your other point, please take no offense (I'm being as gingerly as possible), how does one know if the Bible is well written if he doesn't read it regularly???  Food for thought for an open-minded.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:10, 2 November 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
::::On a side note&mdash;not addressing the argument at hand&mdash;the [[Bible]] article here ''is'' extremely well written and well cited.  One of the best references on the internet, in my opinion.  I think that's what Saskjn was referring to.  --[[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 20:20, 2 November 2009 (EST)
1,237

edits

Navigation menu