Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,206
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + + +
New Welcome Banner proposal (view source)
Revision as of 02:03, November 3, 2009
, 02:03, November 3, 2009another example and updates...
:::::::Here's another SEO test based strictly off of a quick google search for "Wikipedia," here: [http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=Wikipedia&aq=f&aqi=g6g-s1g3&oq=&fp=8ec9ea851cee2c5b Google:Wikipedia]; and for "Conservapedia," here: [http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=Conservapedia&aq=f&aqi=n1g10&oq=&fp=8ec9ea851cee2c5b Google:Conservapedia]. Notice how in Wikipedia's results many of the top pages are for Wikipedia? I believe this is due to their URL, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia The key word "Wikipedia" is used twice, with "wiki" as another important search term used as well. However, for Conservapedia many of the top search results do not point to Conservapedia, which I believe could be increased with the use of this URL: http://conservapedia.com/wiki/conservapedia ... and so on. And also, the tagline, "Conservapedia - Conservapedia, the conservative, family-friendly wiki encyclopedia" would also help increase the search results for Conservapedia.com. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 18:56, 29 October 2009 (EDT)
:::::::Here's another SEO test based strictly off of a quick google search for "Wikipedia," here: [http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=Wikipedia&aq=f&aqi=g6g-s1g3&oq=&fp=8ec9ea851cee2c5b Google:Wikipedia]; and for "Conservapedia," here: [http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=Conservapedia&aq=f&aqi=n1g10&oq=&fp=8ec9ea851cee2c5b Google:Conservapedia]. Notice how in Wikipedia's results many of the top pages are for Wikipedia? I believe this is due to their URL, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia The key word "Wikipedia" is used twice, with "wiki" as another important search term used as well. However, for Conservapedia many of the top search results do not point to Conservapedia, which I believe could be increased with the use of this URL: http://conservapedia.com/wiki/conservapedia ... and so on. And also, the tagline, "Conservapedia - Conservapedia, the conservative, family-friendly wiki encyclopedia" would also help increase the search results for Conservapedia.com. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 18:56, 29 October 2009 (EDT)
:::::::::Here is another example of how I imagine potential changes in meta tags could be used for Conservapedia.com: [http://www.mixx.com/stories/8770713/conservapedia_wiki_encyclopedia Conservapedia - Wiki Encyclopedia - Mixx] (but without using "Mixx," since that's simply a meta title used by Mixx.com.)
:::::::::For instance, currently if you Google for "Conservapedia," the website meta tag title for the site displays the search result "Conservapedia." It's simple and surely, it does work. However, if minor changes are made with (assuming behind the scenes data uses HTML???) Conservapedia's meta tag title, description, etc., to improve the search result to show, "Conservapedia - Wiki Encyclopedia," as well using a meta description that says, "conservapedia.com — [[Conservapedia]] is a [[conservative]], family-friendly [[Wiki]] [[encyclopedia]]." This will certainly help increase SEO results for Conservapedia.com. The current meta description for "Conservapedia" in a google search result show this, "An encyclopaedia with articles written from a conservative viewpoint." So it's close to what I'm suggesting, but I'm optimistically confident that the small changes I hope can be made will help with SEO. This is a benefit to the entire community. As for the "New Welcome Banner," that may simply act as another method for google's crawlers to find pages within Conservapedia much easier. Because I can confidently say right now, Google's spiders are not finding new pages very quickly. This isn't necessarily a "problem," and I'm trying to be as polite and civil about this as possible, but it does hinder the potential search traffic that this site could be getting by not making these small changes. And none of these small changes require the much larger change to the default URL, which is what I was suggesting earlier. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 21:03, 2 November 2009 (EST)
----
----