17,394
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 202:
Line 202: − − :::::::::Peter, I'm glad you read the whole article. You're a minority in that case. According to Nielson & Loranger, 2006, the average reader spends about 27 seconds per page they read. That's about enough time to read the opening paragraph and get the main takeaway from the article. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 13:50, 1 November 2009 (EST)
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 00:41, November 4, 2009
, 00:41, November 4, 2009DerekE is a nasty vandal (see "Obama Administration")
::::::Peter, you're in denial. You well know that the top of an article is the most important, and by far the most widely read. Your refusal to admit that results in a loss in credibility, and makes a discussion about bias with you pointless.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:29, 1 November 2009 (EST)
::::::Peter, you're in denial. You well know that the top of an article is the most important, and by far the most widely read. Your refusal to admit that results in a loss in credibility, and makes a discussion about bias with you pointless.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:29, 1 November 2009 (EST)
::::::::Sure, the top is most important, which is why I'd love to see a hand-pump or something similar as the first image. What's a true sign of denial, however, is your refusal to admit the images in the article completely overlook the majority of humanity. Unless you're able to shed your US/Eurocentrism, and deal with the real problems in the article in question, I see no point in discussing with you further. [[User:PeterF|PeterF]] 11:34, 1 November 2009 (EST)
::::::::Sure, the top is most important, which is why I'd love to see a hand-pump or something similar as the first image. What's a true sign of denial, however, is your refusal to admit the images in the article completely overlook the majority of humanity. Unless you're able to shed your US/Eurocentrism, and deal with the real problems in the article in question, I see no point in discussing with you further. [[User:PeterF|PeterF]] 11:34, 1 November 2009 (EST)