Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, oversight, Administrators
2,260
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 222:
Line 222: − − ::: Isn't that great? It makes no sense at all, but it exposes Schlafly's worldview: if it's bad, it's liberal.[[User:Dantès|Dantès]] 11:27, 4 November 2009 (EST) Line 339:
Line 337: − − ::: Took you a while, Saksjn, but you're finally figuring it out. It's very difficult to do any substantive editing on this site unless it's conservative-biased. I've tried to make several articles more neutral, but have been consistently met with obstinacy and irrelevant personal attacks (including from Schlafly, who dismissed my edits as irrelevant because I live in Canada). Neutrality is not appreciated here and it's honestly not worth the effort. Good for you for trying, but you're wasting your time. [[User:Dantès|Dantès]] 11:23, 4 November 2009 (EST)
Talk:Barack Hussein Obama (view source)
Revision as of 16:39, November 4, 2009
, 16:39, November 4, 2009no edit summary
:: how is that ''liberal'' vandalism? obama's a democrat!
:: how is that ''liberal'' vandalism? obama's a democrat!
==Animal rights==
==Animal rights==
::Your really not here to discuss anything are you? Glad to know you feel your a part of the elite aristocracy that only certain editors such as yourself can be apart of. [[User:Saksjn|Saksjn]] 13:40, 3 November 2009 (EST)
::Your really not here to discuss anything are you? Glad to know you feel your a part of the elite aristocracy that only certain editors such as yourself can be apart of. [[User:Saksjn|Saksjn]] 13:40, 3 November 2009 (EST)