Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
407 bytes added ,  18:49, November 5, 2009
Line 128: Line 128:  
Douglas, the article you cite has nothing to do with vaccination.  The increase in measles '''is''' due to to parents opting out of the vaccine, as was shown by DWiggins citation.  I'm not here to argue whether the NHS is good or bad, but the article you cite does not support the claim you are making when dealing directly with vaccination.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 13:13, 5 November 2009 (EST)
 
Douglas, the article you cite has nothing to do with vaccination.  The increase in measles '''is''' due to to parents opting out of the vaccine, as was shown by DWiggins citation.  I'm not here to argue whether the NHS is good or bad, but the article you cite does not support the claim you are making when dealing directly with vaccination.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 13:13, 5 November 2009 (EST)
 
:I didn't make the claim. You may not realize this, but wiki articles are made by many contributors.  However, DWiggins' citation shows nothing but throwing blame on a public miseducated by the NHS. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 13:26, 5 November 2009 (EST)
 
:I didn't make the claim. You may not realize this, but wiki articles are made by many contributors.  However, DWiggins' citation shows nothing but throwing blame on a public miseducated by the NHS. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 13:26, 5 November 2009 (EST)
 +
::I understand how wikis are made.  I think I've been here for almost a year and a half, if memory serves.  I re-added the first part of DWiggins' edit.  I believe this is a compromise that shows why measles are becoming more prominent in Britain, while not patting the NHS on the back.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 13:49, 5 November 2009 (EST)
1,237

edits

Navigation menu