Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 145:
Line 145: + + +
Talk:Essay:Noah's Ark Was Real (view source)
Revision as of 21:42, November 5, 2009
, 21:42, November 5, 2009→Quick Reply to Karajou
I don't like having to make such a negative reply, whilst I disagree on many levels with Andy and others I have been debating with on this page none of their replies have made me angry, whist yours has me frustrated at the ludicrous way you have responded to my points without even knowing what they are. [[User:jamesmackenzie|James Mackenzie]] 16:16, 5 November 2009 (EST)
I don't like having to make such a negative reply, whilst I disagree on many levels with Andy and others I have been debating with on this page none of their replies have made me angry, whist yours has me frustrated at the ludicrous way you have responded to my points without even knowing what they are. [[User:jamesmackenzie|James Mackenzie]] 16:16, 5 November 2009 (EST)
:Two things, JamesMackenzie: First, I did investigate evolution, I know full-well what evolution consists of; I know it's a claimed "change over time" scenario; and I know full-well that evolutionists such as yourself have no intention of backing those claims up with absolute proof. I and others on this site are fed up with being given a the "hearsay" argument by evolutionists, and ''hearsay'' is all they got. Second, when directed to provide proof of evolution ''as per the Scientific Method'', you back down and turn your reply into the rant that is here. It is you who is ignoring the debunked evidence.
:So, when directed to prove it, you demonstrated an attitude problem. I think you need to edit somewhere else. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:42, 5 November 2009 (EST)