1,237
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 157:
Line 157: +
Talk:Essay:Noah's Ark Was Real (view source)
Revision as of 23:38, November 5, 2009
, 23:38, November 5, 2009→Quick Reply to Karajou
:::::DWiggins, if you look at the history of that article, you'll discover the fact that I wrote it...[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Scientific_method&diff=188946&oldid=168951] :) [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 18:06, 5 November 2009 (EST)
:::::DWiggins, if you look at the history of that article, you'll discover the fact that I wrote it...[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Scientific_method&diff=188946&oldid=168951] :) [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 18:06, 5 November 2009 (EST)
With all due respect, I would not consider 3 edits out of around 100 to in anyway constitute a claim to having 'wrote it'. I said ''some'' rather good details, insofar as it gives a reasonable overview of the scientific method but is rather clumsy in addressing more specific aspects, omitting several key points. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 18:28, 5 November 2009 (EST)
With all due respect, I would not consider 3 edits out of around 100 to in anyway constitute a claim to having 'wrote it'. I said ''some'' rather good details, insofar as it gives a reasonable overview of the scientific method but is rather clumsy in addressing more specific aspects, omitting several key points. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 18:28, 5 November 2009 (EST)
:[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Scientific_method&diff=367588&oldid=168951 That's] a pretty big contribution. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 18:38, 5 November 2009 (EST)