1,237
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 60:
Line 60: − +
Talk:Republican in name only (view source)
Revision as of 00:29, November 6, 2009
, 00:29, November 6, 2009→Article Guideline
:Wouldn't that mean that those who are not even Repbulicans ''in name'' anymore-- Specter, Jeffords, Chaffee and Weicker-- don't belong in the list? Perhaps a new section called "Former RINOs". [[User:ChrisFV|ChrisFV]] 16:06, 5 November 2009 (EST)
:Wouldn't that mean that those who are not even Repbulicans ''in name'' anymore-- Specter, Jeffords, Chaffee and Weicker-- don't belong in the list? Perhaps a new section called "Former RINOs". [[User:ChrisFV|ChrisFV]] 16:06, 5 November 2009 (EST)
::Very curious as to why my last update was reverted. How can one be a '''Republican''' in name only if they're not a Republican? -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:05, 5 November 2009 (EST)
::<strike>Very curious as to why my last update was reverted. How can one be a '''Republican''' in name only if they're not a Republican?<strike> Resolved. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:05, 5 November 2009 (EST)