Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 64: Line 64:  
:It will be good for the article to discuss this denial, in conjunction with [[gay rights]] critics who oppose the points which the denialists says no one advances. (Not worded right, but I think you get the gist.) See you all tomorrow. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 00:29, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:It will be good for the article to discuss this denial, in conjunction with [[gay rights]] critics who oppose the points which the denialists says no one advances. (Not worded right, but I think you get the gist.) See you all tomorrow. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 00:29, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
   −
::There's no more gay agenda other than there was a "black agenda" before ''Brown'' came down.  The gay agenda is equal treatment.  Oh no, quit, ma, shut the doors!  Equality's a-comin'!-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub>
+
::There's no more gay agenda other than there was a "black agenda" before ''Brown'' came down.  The gay agenda is equal treatment.  Oh no, quick, ma, shut the doors!  Equality's a-comin'!-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub>
2,732

edits

Navigation menu