Changes

I intended to answer this glaring example of doublethink a while ago but got caught up in other things. There would have to be hundreds of cows/goats to feed all the animals on the ark, but what would these goats and cows eat? And anyway can't there be more than 8 animals of each type? Furthermore the milk of other species is not very good for animals, this would further reduce resistance to disease and parasites (which is lower in infants too).  [[User:Jamesmackenzie|Jamesmackenzie]] 22:41, 8 November 2009 (EST)

I intended to answer this glaring example of doublethink a while ago but got caught up in other things. There would have to be hundreds of cows/goats to feed all the animals on the ark, but what would these goats and cows eat? And anyway can't there be more than 8 animals of each type? Furthermore the milk of other species is not very good for animals, this would further reduce resistance to disease and parasites (which is lower in infants too).  [[User:Jamesmackenzie|Jamesmackenzie]] 22:41, 8 November 2009 (EST)

:James, you have been told quite clearly several times that 1) there was a lot of stored fodder onboard the ark; 2) that animals onboard occupied a smaller percentage of the total capacity of the ark; 3) that hibernation played a role, saving feeding time; 4) that young animals and unhatched eggs took less room than adults.  Apparently, these simple and rational explantions cannot alter your agenda, which was to come to this site and push whatever Bible-hating mantra you have.  You've been told; you don't want to listen.  Since you want to push the argument ''ad nauseum'', then you need to go elsewhere.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 10:01, 9 November 2009 (EST)

:James, you have been told quite clearly several times that 1) there was a lot of stored fodder onboard the ark; 2) that animals onboard occupied a smaller percentage of the total capacity of the ark; 3) that hibernation played a role, saving feeding time; 4) that young animals and unhatched eggs took less room than adults.  Apparently, these simple and rational explantions cannot alter your agenda, which was to come to this site and push whatever Bible-hating mantra you have.  You've been told; you don't want to listen.  Since you want to push the argument ''ad nauseum'', then you need to go elsewhere.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 10:01, 9 November 2009 (EST)