104
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 466:
Line 466: + +
Talk:Conservative Bible Project (view source)
Revision as of 21:36, November 10, 2009
, 21:36, November 10, 2009→Sources: No Resurrection? No Trinity?
:Well put. Most, perhaps all, of the later additions to the Bible are liberal distortions that should not be kept. There's plenty of good stuff in the original Bible without any need for later stuff.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:11, 10 November 2009 (EST)
:Well put. Most, perhaps all, of the later additions to the Bible are liberal distortions that should not be kept. There's plenty of good stuff in the original Bible without any need for later stuff.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:11, 10 November 2009 (EST)
::So shall I zap Mark 16:9-20 and 1 John 5:7-8? I'd just like to have your say-so before I wipe out the Resurrection and the Trinity. [[User:JosephMac|JosephMac]] 16:36, 10 November 2009 (EST)
== "Idiomatic" shouldn't really "level through" ==
== "Idiomatic" shouldn't really "level through" ==