Changes

::::Your non-answer is an example of [[liberal style]].  The question was clear, and it's clear you don't have an answer.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:36, 11 November 2009 (EST)

::::Your non-answer is an example of [[liberal style]].  The question was clear, and it's clear you don't have an answer.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:36, 11 November 2009 (EST)

:::::I confess that I do not understand why you are acting in such a confrontational manner.  In order to answer your question I must understand it.  I asked whether you were saying that no-one denies that the entire world was flooded in the manner described in the Bible?  You didn't answer.  Is that what you are saying or not?  Further, I am also at a loss to understand why you asked that question of me in the first place.  I professed no expertise in providing "detailed evolutionist explanations".  I am willing to give it a go, but all I did was carry out a task suggested by Karajou.  He said that he would accept that upon the task being carried out he would accept that the ark does not exist.  Obviously you have different criteria in terms of evidence.  I was only seeking to satisfy ''his'' evidentiary criteria.  --[[User:VincentV|VincentV]] 16:44, 11 November 2009 (EST)

:::::I confess that I do not understand why you are acting in such a confrontational manner.  In order to answer your question I must understand it.  I asked whether you were saying that no-one denies that the entire world was flooded in the manner described in the Bible?  You didn't answer.  Is that what you are saying or not?  Further, I am also at a loss to understand why you asked that question of me in the first place.  I professed no expertise in providing "detailed evolutionist explanations".  I am willing to give it a go, but all I did was carry out a task suggested by Karajou.  He said that, upon the task being carried out and no ark being found, he would accept that the ark does not exist.  Obviously you have different criteria in terms of evidence.  I was only seeking to satisfy ''his'' evidentiary criteria.  --[[User:VincentV|VincentV]] 16:44, 11 November 2009 (EST)