Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 65:
Line 65: + + + +
→(Nearly) Complete Rewrite: why so much prominence for Galileo, with no reference to Kepler? Wasn't Kepler way ahead of Galileo?
(Whoops, forgot to sign my name. Sorry.)--[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 16:39, 11 November 2009 (EST)
(Whoops, forgot to sign my name. Sorry.)--[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 16:39, 11 November 2009 (EST)
: You did good work on this. But just to clarify, we don't dumb things down here. We have visitors who hear about string theory who want to sift fact from fiction. Some high school students using this site can understand complex theories ... if they are worth spending time on!
: Also, a question: why so much prominence for Galileo, with no reference to Kepler? Wasn't Kepler way ahead of Galileo?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:12, 11 November 2009 (EST)