Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + + +
User talk:KSorenson (view source)
Revision as of 04:08, November 12, 2009
, 04:08, November 12, 2009this is not Wikipedia where liberal distortions of science dominate. We tell the truth here. The black hole entry is no exception.
::Okay, I resubmitted my changes with a more descriptive edit summary. Thank you very much for calling my attention to it.--[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 22:47, 11 November 2009 (EST)
::Okay, I resubmitted my changes with a more descriptive edit summary. Thank you very much for calling my attention to it.--[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 22:47, 11 November 2009 (EST)
You didn't insert a "clarification" of the falsifiability defect in the theory of [[black hole]]s, you deleted it. So again I found your edit summary to be misleading.
More generally, this is not Wikipedia where [[liberal]] distortions of science dominate. We tell the truth here. The [[black hole]] entry is no exception.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:08, 11 November 2009 (EST)