SkipCaptcha
710
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: + +
User talk:KSorenson (view source)
Revision as of 19:14, November 12, 2009
, 19:14, November 12, 2009no edit summary
::::I don't know about needing better editors, but this site certainly needs some better articles. I was trying to help with that, but Aschlafly's condescension and confrontational attitude really soured my taste for it. Some additional reading I did last night to try to better understand his point of view put me off even further. I'm unsure how to work with someone who writes [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Mystery:Young_Hollywood_Breast_Cancer_Victims these things] then tries to start an argument over "falsifiability" in advanced theoretical physics.--[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 12:57, 12 November 2009 (EST)
::::I don't know about needing better editors, but this site certainly needs some better articles. I was trying to help with that, but Aschlafly's condescension and confrontational attitude really soured my taste for it. Some additional reading I did last night to try to better understand his point of view put me off even further. I'm unsure how to work with someone who writes [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Mystery:Young_Hollywood_Breast_Cancer_Victims these things] then tries to start an argument over "falsifiability" in advanced theoretical physics.--[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 12:57, 12 November 2009 (EST)
:::::I won't deny that I've had [[Talk:Elementary proof|my share of arguments]] [[Talk:Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|with Mr. Schlafly]] about math and science articles. That doesn't mean that it's impossible to continue to edit here, or that the edits can't be useful to their many readers. I have successfully worked together with him on several other articles. I encourage you to do the same. --[[User:MarkGall|MarkGall]] 14:14, 12 November 2009 (EST)