209
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 230:
Line 230: + +
Talk:Essay:Noah's Ark Was Real (view source)
Revision as of 01:43, November 13, 2009
, 01:43, November 13, 2009→Is this debate necessary?
::::::Vincent, if you don't want to open your mind, then no one else is going to open it for you. There is no logical flaw in the biblical account of the Flood. Can you accept that? If not, you're wasting your time and ours. And, by the way, evolutionists cannot explain how mammals survived the undeniably massive flooding that did occur.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:23, 11 November 2009 (EST)
::::::Vincent, if you don't want to open your mind, then no one else is going to open it for you. There is no logical flaw in the biblical account of the Flood. Can you accept that? If not, you're wasting your time and ours. And, by the way, evolutionists cannot explain how mammals survived the undeniably massive flooding that did occur.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:23, 11 November 2009 (EST)
To be perfectly fair, your statement rests on the assumption that the global, not one of which agrees that a flood on the scale described in the Bible occurred. I think you are misapplying the theory of evolution as well. The theory does not really try and address the question you have posed about surviving flooding, it is an attempt to answer the question of 'the origin of the species'. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 20:43, 12 November 2009 (EST)