Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
396 bytes added ,  02:10, November 13, 2009
falsifiability is not part of the physics curriculum
Line 51: Line 51:     
:Clearly the right course of action is for someone to revise the [[black hole]] article and rewrite your odious "falsifiability" lie into something that makes the point you want made in a way that's both clear and honest, since right now that part of the article is neither. Unfortunately I'm not the girl to make that revision, as your stubbornness, your bad attitude and your snide and condescending remarks have put me in a very foul mood.--[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 20:09, 12 November 2009 (EST)
 
:Clearly the right course of action is for someone to revise the [[black hole]] article and rewrite your odious "falsifiability" lie into something that makes the point you want made in a way that's both clear and honest, since right now that part of the article is neither. Unfortunately I'm not the girl to make that revision, as your stubbornness, your bad attitude and your snide and condescending remarks have put me in a very foul mood.--[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 20:09, 12 November 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
::KSorenson, I don't think you understand the concept of [[falsifiability]].  That wouldn't be surprising, because it is not part of the physics curriculum, and most physics majors and grad students are clueless about it.  No big deal ... if you're willing to learn it with an open mind now.  If not, then you're wasting our time.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:10, 12 November 2009 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,214

edits

Navigation menu