Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
347 bytes added ,  02:56, November 13, 2009
reply re: opening the mind
Line 59: Line 59:     
:::I see that someone else has already submitted a revision to the [[black hole]] article. It's an excellent change, both clear and accurate. Once the utterly false sentence "As with the related theoretical concept of a 'wormhole', it is impossible to prove that a black hole does not exist, and thus it fails the falsifiability requirement of science" is removed, that article will be in good shape. Assuming you're honest enough to let it stand, that is.--[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 21:43, 12 November 2009 (EST)
 
:::I see that someone else has already submitted a revision to the [[black hole]] article. It's an excellent change, both clear and accurate. Once the utterly false sentence "As with the related theoretical concept of a 'wormhole', it is impossible to prove that a black hole does not exist, and thus it fails the falsifiability requirement of science" is removed, that article will be in good shape. Assuming you're honest enough to let it stand, that is.--[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 21:43, 12 November 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
::::KSorenson, you haven't opened your mind and thought for yourself.  I urge you to do so, for your sake.  Did any of your professors ever suggest that?  It doesn't take hundreds of words to explain.  Once you open your mind, your only regret will be that you didn't do it sooner.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:56, 12 November 2009 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,210

edits

Navigation menu